power from the wind

 

 

Back to bamboo

Researchers in India have been investigating ways to improve the design of Savonius wind turbines for small-scale electricity generation. UK Saha et al of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, have published a paper Twisted bamboo bladed rotor for Savonius wind turbines in the Journal of the Solar Energy Society of India (SESI), Vol. 4 (2005). This follows on from earlier work that led to the development of a twisted-blade Savonius rotor fabricated from sheet metal.

Experiments with the bamboo-bladed rotor showed a slightly lower rotational speed than the twisted metal blades, but the researchers believe the low cost and the ease of fabrication could make this type of design useful for small-scale power generation in rural areas. The design proposed by the researchers uses sheets made out of woven bamboo, cut to size and stitched at the edges for strength and durability. A paper covering gives an improved surface finish and aerodynamic performance.

Whether the application is a small-scale, low-cost Savonius turbine or a full-size aerofoil turbine blade, there is an additional environmental benefit in using natural materials. Vestas says it has performed a life-cycle assessment (LCA) on its V90-3.0 MW offshore wind turbine and established that it has to generate electricity for just 6.8 months before it has produced as much energy as was consumed throughout its design lifetime. However, carbon-fibre composites require considerable amounts of energy to manufacture, which will have slightly increased this pay-back time. By using natural materials such as wood or bamboo for a turbine's construction, the environmental benefits can be even greater.

 

 

from the "Engineer Live" publication, 5th Sept '07

Wind turbines turn full circle – from wood to carbon fibre and back again

Wind energy is a renewable and environmentally-friendly alternative to fossil fuels but wind turbines must operate efficiently if their benefits are to be maximised. One crucial aspect of their design that has a direct bearing on both their sustainability and efficiency is the materials of construction. Paul Stevens reports.

Three hundred years ago a millwright had little choice of materials for constructing a windmill, except that different types of wood were available from which to make the various parts. Wood was in plentiful supply, it could be readily worked to fabricate anything from gear teeth to cladding, and the parts lasted well and could be repaired or replaced if they became damaged. Indeed, numerous examples of seventeenth century windmills are still in existence, though the earliest horizontal-axis windmills in North Western Europe were built in the late twelfth century.

With industrialisation and, later, the construction of electricity plants powered by fossil fuels, wind had become a little used source of energy by the mid-twentieth century. However, by the end of the twentieth century and the start of the twenty-first century, wind was being recognised again as a useful source of renewable energy. Once installed and operating, wind turbines do not generate greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide or other pollutants, and the energy supply is free and cannot be depleted (though wind speed is certainly not constant in Northern Europe).

Instead of millwrights, today we have multinational companies that can take on thecomplete design, construction, installation and maintenance of wind turbines. Danish company Vestas, for example, started manufacturing wind turbines in 1979 and has concentrated exclusively on wind energy since 1987. Vestas is now a global high-technology group with more than 13,000 employees, supplying turbines capable of generating nominal power outputs of 850kW to 3.0MW, with corresponding rotor diameters from 52m to 90m.

Blade technology has played a crucial role in the development of modern wind turbines. Glass-fibre reinforced composites are the material of choice for many turbine manufacturers, but carbon-fibre composites offer a higher stiffness-to-weight ratio. This enables the blades to be lighter and stiffer (depending on the detailed design), which helps to improve the turbine's performance and reduce the costs associated with transport to site and installation. Given that each blade is only manufactured once yet is required to operate for 20 years, a small increase in manufacturing cost for an improvement in operating performance is an attractive proposition. So this is the approach adopted by Vestas for its latest V90-3.0 MW turbine.

Vestas has also gone to considerable lengths to optimise the design of the support tower in its V90-3.0 MW turbine. Not only has a higher-strength steel been used to reduce the volume required (and to reduce weight as well), but the company says that it has pioneered the use of magnets to fasten internal components to the tower walls, thereby helping to improve fatigue strength compared with traditional welding or fastening methods.

Wood and bamboo

While the ancient problem of how to extract useful energy from wind has resulted in the application of some high-technology solutions, it should not be forgotten that natural materials still have a lot to offer for turbine blades. Wood - which is a natural, renewable fibre-reinforced composite - has superb fatigue characteristics and an unbeatable strength-to-cost ratio. Twenty years ago khaya (African mahogany) was used, but this was superseded first by poplar and, more recently, by Finnish birch.

In the UK, wind turbine blades have been manufactured from wood since the early 1980s. Thousands of these have been produced, and the early blades have completed 20 years of trouble-free service. These blades are constructed with a hollow shell moulded in two halves with a shear web bridging between the two halves. Wood represents approximately 70 per cent of the blade mass, with the remaining 30 per cent made up of glass cloth, resin and metal inserts for connecting the blade root to the rotor hub.

However, there is another natural alternative that is currently being developed, especially with a view to wind farms planned for China. Bamboo is often referred to as a wood but, in fact, it is a grass. For turbine blades, good quality bamboo actually offers better properties than Finnish birch and, given the vast and sustainable supply of bamboo available in China, it is an excellent material for wind turbine blade construction. Dr Jim Platts of Cambridge University, who established a company called Composite Technology (now part of Vestas) over 20 years ago, has been helping China to develop its wind turbine industry.

Horizontal versus vertical axis

This 'propeller' type of wind turbine, referred to as a horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT), has a number of benefits. These include the ability to vary the blades’ angle of attack to maximise the amount of energy extracted from the wind, the turbine’s self-starting characteristic, and the way the turbine can be mounted on a tall tower to access stronger winds higher above ground level. Disadvantages include the difficulty of transporting and installing the towers and turbines, and unpopularity due to their obstruction of views and high noise levels.

Vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) designs are also available. These are generally claimed to be easier to transport, install and maintain, and they are quieter and do not need to be turned into the wind. A higher aerofoil pitch angle also provides improved aerodynamics as well as decreased drag at low and high speeds. Overall efficiency, however, is approximately 50 per cent lower than for HAWTs, partly because of the additional drag caused by the blades rotating into the wind, and VAWTs are not as good at self-starting as HAWTs.

Nevertheless, one Darrieus-type VAWT that has entered production is the Quietrevolution QR5, designed by XCO2 and marketed by Quietrevolution of London. The QR5 is designed for use in urban environments, being quiet, compact (5m tall by 3.1m in diameter) and capable of extracting useful amounts of energy from the turbulent wind conditions encountered in the vicinity of buildings. Carbon fibre and epoxy resin are used for the three helical blades, spars and torque tube, with a 6kW direct-drive inline generator incorporated at the base of the turbine. Quietrevolution says the QR5 can either be mounted as a standalone generator or in groups within a Y-shaped frame.

The Darrieus wind turbine is probably the most well known design of VAWT, but another is the Savonius wind turbine. Although these are less efficient than other types of wind turbine, they are simpler and cheaper to manufacture, and require very little maintenance – any one of which could be a deciding factor in a limited number of applications.

Llumarlite, a company best known for lighting products, is a distributor for the Ropatec VAWTs that feature aerofoil-shaped vanes (as with the Darrieus concept) and a central cylindrical element that diverts the air (somewhat similar to the way Savonius blades divert air onto each other). The result is claimed to be a low-maintenance turbine that stalls at high wind speeds (to prevent damage), yet at lower speeds delivers an output comparable to that of a HAWT. Llumarlite says the Windrotor can be used either as a source of dc power for applications such as battery charging, or it can be connected to an inverter for delivering ac power or connected to a grid. Being a low-noise turbine, it can be located within urban environments. Interestingly, Ropatec manufactures its Windrotor turbines largely from aluminium.

Back to bamboo

Researchers in India have been investigating ways to improve the design of Savonius wind turbines for small-scale electricity generation. UK Saha et al of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, have published a paper Twisted bamboo bladed rotor for Savonius wind turbines in the Journal of the Solar Energy Society of India (SESI), Vol. 4 (2005). This follows on from earlier work that led to the development of a twisted-blade Savonius rotor fabricated from sheet metal.

Experiments with the bamboo-bladed rotor showed a slightly lower rotational speed than the twisted metal blades, but the researchers believe the low cost and the ease of fabrication could make this type of design useful for small-scale power generation in rural areas. The design proposed by the researchers uses sheets made out of woven bamboo, cut to size and stitched at the edges for strength and durability. A paper covering gives an improved surface finish and aerodynamic performance.

Whether the application is a small-scale, low-cost Savonius turbine or a full-size aerofoil turbine blade, there is an additional environmental benefit in using natural materials. Vestas says it has performed a life-cycle assessment (LCA) on its V90-3.0 MW offshore wind turbine and established that it has to generate electricity for just 6.8 months before it has produced as much energy as was consumed throughout its design lifetime. However, carbon-fibre composites require considerable amounts of energy to manufacture, which will have slightly increased this pay-back time. By using natural materials such as wood or bamboo for a turbine's construction, the environmental benefits can

 

 

 

€20bn listing boosts wind farm growth

Spanish group to float world's largest renewables company as green power industry blows hot

By Tim Webb

Published: 09 September 2007

 
Iberdrola, the Spanish energy giant that bought ScottishPower last year, will raise up to €4bn (£2.7bn) when it floats the world's largest wind power company.

The Spanish hope to list their Iberenova division, which analysts say will be valued between €16bn and €20bn, next month – in Madrid and not in London, like the parent company.

Iberenova is the world's largest wind farm operator and owner, with a portfolio of wind farms with 6,500MW capacity, as well as 350MW of hydro power in operation – equivalent to about a tenth of the UK's total generating capacity – and a further 40,000MW of planned wind farms in the pipeline. Included in the portfolio are the wind farms owned by ScottishPower, made up of 1,750MW operating capacity in the US and 360MW in the UK.

By selling one-fifth of the subsidiary's shares, Iberdrola will raise capital to finance its planned developments. The construction of wind farms requires a large upfront investment – typically just under £1m for every MW of an onshore farm. However, wind farms cost almost nothing to run compared to coal and gas plants.

Credit Suisse, JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and the Spanish bank BBVA are handling the float. Bankers are still working on the shareholder prospectus and are planning roadshows for prospective investors.

Iberdrola confirmed last month the division would be spun off in the final quarter. It wants to get the float away early next month if possible, with the new company having an English name.

Iberdrola bought ScottishPower in November for £11.6bn in cash and shares. Banks arranged a debt financing package of £8bn to pay for the acquisition and help refinance debt. Raising up to €4bn from the float to fund Iberenova's expansion will help free up Iberdrola's balance sheet.

The wind farm industry has grown massively in recent years as government subsidies, high oil prices and economies of scale start to take effect. Airtricity, the Irish wind farm company run by Eddie O'Connor, with over 10,000MW of wind farms at the planning stage, is rumoured to be looking to sell its US operations for a reported £1.5bn. The company, which is 51 per cent owned by infrastructure company NTR, could also be floated by its parent.

Mr O'Connor has ambitious plans to build dozens of huge offshore wind farms between the UK, Germany and the Netherlands in the North Sea, connected by a European offshore "super grid" to provide the continent with renewable energy. Spreading the wind farms wide enough should ensure that the wind is always blowing and the turbines turning somewhere.

Airtricity has already submitted plans for the first stage of the project, to build a 10GW wind farm – enough to provide power to over three million homes – consisting of about 2,000 turbines which would cover an area of 3,000sq km.

Despite moves towards more economic and regulatory integration, a Europe-wide electricity market has yet to emerge. A North Sea grid, which would need international regulation, could be the first step towards this. Mr O'Connor wants support from the three countries and the European Union, as well as a commitment from the European Investment Bank to underwrite the debt required to finance the project.

................................................................

 

This is an example of how facts can be distorted to suit the prejudice of opponents of Wind Turbines

note the grossly exaggerated height of the wind turbine, which should in reality be less than a third of the shown height

 

Simple trigonometry shows--- tan O/A (100/800) =tangent

 0.125 =7.26 degree angle to top of blade from cottage.

Which is itself some way from the observer point, so resulting in an even flatter angle than 7.25

 

 

 

 

 

..............................

 

The article, with letter in reply  below, is a classic example of the way that the Press screams panic loudly enough to attract readers attention, ignoring  the facts, which are diametrically opposed to the headline.   

Pity that the scare headlines are the ones that are most likely to be remembered, especially by anyone glancing through the paper.  I would emphasise that this was not the intention of the author

 

"House price chill in the wind"

By BEN KENDALL

 

Some homes affected by windfarms, say surveyors

 

If the Government has its way, towering turbines and whirring blades could become a common and, to many, unwelcome feature of East Anglia's skyline. As the Department of Trade and Industry's Renewables Obligation forces power companies to increase the proportion of green energy produced to more than l0% by 2010-11, more attention is being focused on wind power.

But a survey published today has supported many residents' fears; that windfarms have a negative impact on house prices. The findings of the survey, carried out by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), show 62pc of those who responded believe such development would decrease the value of properties in residential areas. And this impact can be felt before a single turbine is erected. The report states that prices begin to fall as soon as a planning application is lodged. With the recently completed £75m Scroby Sands project near Yarmouth and the Ecotricity windfarm at Swaffham paving the way for other developments in the county, the news confirms the concerns of residents. But the study could encourage companies to erect turbines on agricultural land away from residential properties.

Only 31pc of respondents suggested wind-farm development negatively influenced the value of agricultural land, while 61pc suggested there was no impact at all. Some even felt windfarms could be a positive factor because they increased values as a result of payments to landowners for use of their land.  Peter Hornor, a chartered surveyor from Brown and Co, which covers Norwich and Norfolk, said that with the wind-power industry in its infancy, as much information as possible was needed on its impacts.

"There is certainly a perception among residents that these farms do have a negative impact and there is concern among some that they may be a blight on the landscape," he commented. "It does seem clear that such an impact isn't felt in agricultural areas and I think that is something companies may take into account."

The study states: "The negative impact of windfarms on property values appears to decline from around two years after the completion of the development. "This may suggest that the impact lessens as windfarms become a more established part of the landscape."

But this is not a view shared by residents' groups. Brian Kidd, chairman of the “Campaign Against Turbines” at Shipdham and Scarning (CATSS) that has been fighting windfarm plans since 2002, said: "These results just prove what we've been arguing all along, but having a study like this will certainly add weight to our argument. There are many reasons to oppose these turbines, but  the house-price issue is certainly a key one. Even though the windfarm in this area is only at the planning stage we have already noticed an impact on property prices and saleability.

"There is nothing to suggest this will change over time.  One neighbour of mine had nearly sold their house, but when the buyer found out about the plans they pulled out straight away. What we need now is for politicians to start taking notice of studies like this and actually do something about it. A shift towards development on agricultural land is certainly one way round the problem and it's worth looking at."

According to the RICS study, large detached residential properties are the most affected and the impact lessens with distance from a windfarm.  RlCS chief economist Milan Khatri stressed it was too early to fully assess the impact.

"The UK's onshore windfarm industry is young, but argument over its impact on the landscape, wider environment and the effect on property prices has been heated," he explained. "Our survey "shows a clear majority who find that a windfarm nearby suppresses house prices. But with 40%  finding no negative impact, it is too early to say categorically that windfarms are a serious threat to homeowners. We will have to wait to see how the market reacts to windfarms in the longer term, but it is clear that more research will be needed in due course."

 

 

Peter Lanyon,

3 Spencer Close

Little Plumstead, Norfolk NR13 5JE

 4 November 2004

 The Editor,The Eastern Daily Press

Dear Sir.

Your report (EDP Nov 4) of the RIGS survey, into the effect of  in residential areas, quoted 62% of respondents "believing" the farms caused a decrease in property value, and 40% finding no negative impact. That's 102%, even without the "don't knows". Well done'

Just how many windfarms are proposed for residential areas, anyway? You seem to have found only one residents’ group to quote - CATSS; and they'd yell against windfarms even if there was nothing else to cool their beer. And what is this "believing" doing anyway in a hard-nosed survey by Chartered Surveyors? Either the prices go down or they don't. And much later on in the article, when most people will have got bored with it, you admit the perceived decrease either disappears after a couple of years, or is a misperception altogether.

You do the same thing in your leading article on the same subject - first of all confirming the negative impact and then burying the issue in wordy ambivalence. The fact that you have to spin the story so much is proof enough that it is rubbish, and that wind power is one good way to go towards the sustainable energy on which are future survival depends.

 Yours faithfully,

 P.Lanyon

"Asleep at the Geiger Counter"
aims   -  newsletter one    -  newsletter two    -   newsletter three

-   environment    nuclear industry    -   letters

  -    membership     climate change  & the effects of air travel    -  world comment   

alternatives   -   foe    -   identity cards